Benchmarking Dependence Measures to Prevent Shortcut Learning in Medical Imaging

Sarah Müller, Louisa Fay, Lisa M. Koch, Sergios Gatidis, Thomas Küstner +1 more
7/26/2024
cs.CVcs.LG

No official code found. Best implementation: berenslab/dependence-measures-medical-imaging (0 stars, MIT, last commit 2025-08-01).

Abstract

Medical imaging cohorts are often confounded by factors such as acquisition devices, hospital sites, patient backgrounds, and many more. As a result, deep learning models tend to learn spurious correlations instead of causally related features, limiting their generalizability to new and unseen data. This problem can be addressed by minimizing dependence measures between intermediate representations of task-related and non-task-related variables. These measures include mutual information, distance correlation, and the performance of adversarial classifiers. Here, we benchmark such dependence measures for the task of preventing shortcut learning. We study a simplified setting using Morpho-MNIST and a medical imaging task with CheXpert chest radiographs. Our results provide insights into how to mitigate confounding factors in medical imaging.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

MIT

This repository contains the code for the paper "Benchmarking Dependence Measures to Prevent Shortcut Learning in Medical Imaging".

00Shell, PythonJul 25, 20241 years agoMIT
disentangled-representationsdomain-shiftshortcut-learning

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{mller2024benchmarking,
  title  = {Benchmarking Dependence Measures to Prevent Shortcut Learning in Medical Imaging},
  author = {Sarah Müller and Louisa Fay and Lisa M. Koch and Sergios Gatidis and Thomas Küstner and Philipp Berens},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2407.18792},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.18792v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2407.18792.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2407.18792)

Discussion