Sharp Bounds for Poly-GNNs and the Effect of Graph Noise

Luciano Vinas, Arash A. Amini
7/28/2024
cs.LGmath.STstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We investigate the classification performance of graph neural networks with graph-polynomial features, poly-GNNs, on the problem of semi-supervised node classification. We analyze poly-GNNs under a general contextual stochastic block model (CSBM) by providing a sharp characterization of the rate of separation between classes in their output node representations. A question of interest is whether this rate depends on the depth of the network $k$, i.e., whether deeper networks can achieve a faster separation? We provide a negative answer to this question: for a sufficiently large graph, a depth $k > 1$ poly-GNN exhibits the same rate of separation as a depth $k=1$ counterpart. Our analysis highlights and quantifies the impact of ``graph noise'' in deep GNNs and shows how noise in the graph structure can dominate other sources of signal in the graph, negating any benefit further aggregation provides. Our analysis also reveals subtle differences between even and odd-layered GNNs in how the feature noise propagates.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{vinas2024sharp,
  title  = {Sharp Bounds for Poly-GNNs and the Effect of Graph Noise},
  author = {Luciano Vinas and Arash A. Amini},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2407.19567},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.19567v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2407.19567.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2407.19567)

Discussion