BEExAI: Benchmark to Evaluate Explainable AI

Samuel Sithakoul, Sara Meftah, Clément Feutry
7/29/2024
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL

No official code found. Best implementation: SquareResearchCenter-AI/BEExAI (21 stars, BSD-3-Clause, PyTorch, last commit 2025-03-14).

Abstract

Recent research in explainability has given rise to numerous post-hoc attribution methods aimed at enhancing our comprehension of the outputs of black-box machine learning models. However, evaluating the quality of explanations lacks a cohesive approach and a consensus on the methodology for deriving quantitative metrics that gauge the efficacy of explainability post-hoc attribution methods. Furthermore, with the development of increasingly complex deep learning models for diverse data applications, the need for a reliable way of measuring the quality and correctness of explanations is becoming critical. We address this by proposing BEExAI, a benchmark tool that allows large-scale comparison of different post-hoc XAI methods, employing a set of selected evaluation metrics.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

PyTorchBSD-3-Clause

Benchmark to Evaluate EXplainable AI

212Python, Jupyter NotebookMar 1, 20241 years agoBSD-3-Clause
benchmarkexplainabilityexplainable-aiinterpretabilitymachine-learning+3 more

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{sithakoul2024beexai,
  title  = {BEExAI: Benchmark to Evaluate Explainable AI},
  author = {Samuel Sithakoul and Sara Meftah and Clément Feutry},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2407.19897},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.19897v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2407.19897.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2407.19897)

Discussion