Exploiting Preferences in Loss Functions for Sequential Recommendation via Weak Transitivity

Hyunsoo Chung, Jungtaek Kim, Hyungeun Jo, Hyungwon Choi
8/1/2024
cs.LGcs.IR

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

A choice of optimization objective is immensely pivotal in the design of a recommender system as it affects the general modeling process of a user's intent from previous interactions. Existing approaches mainly adhere to three categories of loss functions: pairwise, pointwise, and setwise loss functions. Despite their effectiveness, a critical and common drawback of such objectives is viewing the next observed item as a unique positive while considering all remaining items equally negative. Such a binary label assignment is generally limited to assuring a higher recommendation score of the positive item, neglecting potential structures induced by varying preferences between other unobserved items. To alleviate this issue, we propose a novel method that extends original objectives to explicitly leverage the different levels of preferences as relative orders between their scores. Finally, we demonstrate the superior performance of our method compared to baseline objectives.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{chung2024exploiting,
  title  = {Exploiting Preferences in Loss Functions for Sequential Recommendation via Weak Transitivity},
  author = {Hyunsoo Chung and Jungtaek Kim and Hyungeun Jo and Hyungwon Choi},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2408.00326},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.00326v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2408.00326.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2408.00326)

Discussion