Are Bigger Encoders Always Better in Vision Large Models?

Bozhou Li, Hao Liang, Zimo Meng, Wentao Zhang
8/1/2024
cs.CVcs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

In recent years, multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown strong potential in real-world applications. They are developing rapidly due to their remarkable ability to comprehend multimodal information and their inherent powerful cognitive and reasoning capabilities. Among MLLMs, vision language models (VLM) stand out for their ability to understand vision information. However, the scaling trend of VLMs under the current mainstream paradigm has not been extensively studied. Whether we can achieve better performance by training even larger models is still unclear. To address this issue, we conducted experiments on the pretraining stage of MLLMs. We conduct our experiment using different encoder sizes and large language model (LLM) sizes. Our findings indicate that merely increasing the size of encoders does not necessarily enhance the performance of VLMs. Moreover, we analyzed the effects of LLM backbone parameter size and data quality on the pretraining outcomes. Additionally, we explored the differences in scaling laws between LLMs and VLMs.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{li2024bigger,
  title  = {Are Bigger Encoders Always Better in Vision Large Models?},
  author = {Bozhou Li and Hao Liang and Zimo Meng and Wentao Zhang},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2408.00620},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.00620v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2408.00620.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2408.00620)

Discussion