SCENE: Evaluating Explainable AI Techniques Using Soft Counterfactuals

Haoran Zheng, Utku Pamuksuz
8/8/2024
cs.AIcs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) plays a crucial role in enhancing the transparency and accountability of AI models, particularly in natural language processing (NLP) tasks. However, popular XAI methods such as LIME and SHAP have been found to be unstable and potentially misleading, underscoring the need for a standardized evaluation approach. This paper introduces SCENE (Soft Counterfactual Evaluation for Natural language Explainability), a novel evaluation method that leverages large language models (LLMs) to generate Soft Counterfactual explanations in a zero-shot manner. By focusing on token-based substitutions, SCENE creates contextually appropriate and semantically meaningful Soft Counterfactuals without extensive fine-tuning. SCENE adopts Validitysoft and Csoft metrics to assess the effectiveness of model-agnostic XAI methods in text classification tasks. Applied to CNN, RNN, and Transformer architectures, SCENE provides valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of various XAI techniques.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zheng2024scene,
  title  = {SCENE: Evaluating Explainable AI Techniques Using Soft Counterfactuals},
  author = {Haoran Zheng and Utku Pamuksuz},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2408.04575},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.04575v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2408.04575.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2408.04575)

Discussion