Quantifying the Corpus Bias Problem in Automatic Music Transcription Systems

Lukáš Samuel Marták, Patricia Hu, Gerhard Widmer
8/8/2024
cs.SDcs.LGeess.AS

No official code found. Best implementation: CPJKU/musical_distribution_shift (1 star, last commit 2026-02-05).

Abstract

Automatic Music Transcription (AMT) is the task of recognizing notes in audio recordings of music. The State-of-the-Art (SotA) benchmarks have been dominated by deep learning systems. Due to the scarcity of high quality data, they are usually trained and evaluated exclusively or predominantly on classical piano music. Unfortunately, that hinders our ability to understand how they generalize to other music. Previous works have revealed several aspects of memorization and overfitting in these systems. We identify two primary sources of distribution shift: the music, and the sound. Complementing recent results on the sound axis (i.e. acoustics, timbre), we investigate the musical one (i.e. note combinations, dynamics, genre). We evaluate the performance of several SotA AMT systems on two new experimental test sets which we carefully construct to emulate different levels of musical distribution shift. Our results reveal a stark performance gap, shedding further light on the Corpus Bias problem, and the extent to which it continues to trouble these systems.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

Musical Distribution Shift in Automatic Music Transcription

11Python, Jupyter NotebookJun 11, 20248 months agoNOASSERTION

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{martk2024quantifying,
  title  = {Quantifying the Corpus Bias Problem in Automatic Music Transcription Systems},
  author = {Lukáš Samuel Marták and Patricia Hu and Gerhard Widmer},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2408.04737},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.04737v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2408.04737.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2408.04737)

Discussion