Explainable AI Reloaded: Challenging the XAI Status Quo in the Era of Large Language Models

Upol Ehsan, Mark O. Riedl
8/9/2024
cs.HCcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

When the initial vision of Explainable (XAI) was articulated, the most popular framing was to open the (proverbial) "black-box" of AI so that we could understand the inner workings. With the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs), the very ability to open the black-box is increasingly limited especially when it comes to non-AI expert end-users. In this paper, we challenge the assumption of "opening" the black-box in the LLM era and argue for a shift in our XAI expectations. Highlighting the epistemic blind spots of an algorithm-centered XAI view, we argue that a human-centered perspective can be a path forward. We operationalize the argument by synthesizing XAI research along three dimensions: explainability outside the black-box, explainability around the edges of the black box, and explainability that leverages infrastructural seams. We conclude with takeaways that reflexively inform XAI as a domain.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{ehsan2024explainable,
  title  = {Explainable AI Reloaded: Challenging the XAI Status Quo in the Era of Large Language Models},
  author = {Upol Ehsan and Mark O. Riedl},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2408.05345},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.05345v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2408.05345.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2408.05345)

Discussion