Do Vision-Language Foundational models show Robust Visual Perception?

Shivam Chandhok, Pranav Tandon
8/13/2024
cs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Recent advances in vision-language foundational models have enabled development of systems that can perform visual understanding and reasoning tasks. However, it is unclear if these models are robust to distribution shifts, and how their performance and generalization capabilities vary under changes in data distribution. In this project we strive to answer the question "Are vision-language foundational models robust to distribution shifts like human perception?" Specifically, we consider a diverse range of vision-language models and compare how the performance of these systems is affected by corruption based distribution shifts (such as \textit{motion blur, fog, snow, gaussian noise}) commonly found in practical real-world scenarios. We analyse the generalization capabilities qualitatively and quantitatively on zero-shot image classification task under aforementioned distribution shifts. Our code will be avaible at \url{https://github.com/shivam-chandhok/CPSC-540-Project}

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{chandhok2024visionlanguage,
  title  = {Do Vision-Language Foundational models show Robust Visual Perception?},
  author = {Shivam Chandhok and Pranav Tandon},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2408.06781},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.06781v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2408.06781.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2408.06781)

Discussion