Leveraging Language Models for Emotion and Behavior Analysis in Education

Kaito Tanaka, Benjamin Tan, Brian Wong
8/13/2024
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 4 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

The analysis of students' emotions and behaviors is crucial for enhancing learning outcomes and personalizing educational experiences. Traditional methods often rely on intrusive visual and physiological data collection, posing privacy concerns and scalability issues. This paper proposes a novel method leveraging large language models (LLMs) and prompt engineering to analyze textual data from students. Our approach utilizes tailored prompts to guide LLMs in detecting emotional and engagement states, providing a non-intrusive and scalable solution. We conducted experiments using Qwen, ChatGPT, Claude2, and GPT-4, comparing our method against baseline models and chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting. Results demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms the baselines in both accuracy and contextual understanding. This study highlights the potential of LLMs combined with prompt engineering to offer practical and effective tools for educational emotion and behavior analysis.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 4 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{tanaka2024leveraging,
  title  = {Leveraging Language Models for Emotion and Behavior Analysis in Education},
  author = {Kaito Tanaka and Benjamin Tan and Brian Wong},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2408.06874},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.06874v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2408.06874.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2408.06874)

Discussion