Training Overhead Ratio: A Practical Reliability Metric for Large Language Model Training Systems

Ning Lu, Qian Xie, Hao Zhang, Wenyi Fang, Yang Zheng +2 more
8/14/2024
cs.DCcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 3 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are revolutionizing the AI industry with their superior capabilities. Training these models requires large-scale GPU clusters and significant computing time, leading to frequent failures that significantly increase training costs. Despite its significance, this field lacks a metric for evaluating reliability. In this work, we introduce a novel reliability metric called \emph{Training Overhead Ratio} (TOR) to evaluate the reliability of fault-tolerant LLM training systems. TOR is defined as the ratio of optimal training time to the observed training time of a system, serving as a practical tool for users to estimate the actual time required to train an LLM on a given system. Furthermore, our investigation identifies the key factor for enhancing reliability and present TOR equations for various types of failures encountered in practice.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 3 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{lu2024training,
  title  = {Training Overhead Ratio: A Practical Reliability Metric for Large Language Model Training Systems},
  author = {Ning Lu and Qian Xie and Hao Zhang and Wenyi Fang and Yang Zheng and Zheng Hu and Jiantao Ma},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2408.07482},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.07482v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2408.07482.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2408.07482)

Discussion