Towards Efficient Large Language Models for Scientific Text: A Review

Huy Quoc To, Ming Liu, Guangyan Huang
8/20/2024
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 6 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have ushered in a new era for processing complex information in various fields, including science. The increasing amount of scientific literature allows these models to acquire and understand scientific knowledge effectively, thus improving their performance in a wide range of tasks. Due to the power of LLMs, they require extremely expensive computational resources, intense amounts of data, and training time. Therefore, in recent years, researchers have proposed various methodologies to make scientific LLMs more affordable. The most well-known approaches align in two directions. It can be either focusing on the size of the models or enhancing the quality of data. To date, a comprehensive review of these two families of methods has not yet been undertaken. In this paper, we (I) summarize the current advances in the emerging abilities of LLMs into more accessible AI solutions for science, and (II) investigate the challenges and opportunities of developing affordable solutions for scientific domains using LLMs.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 6 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{to2024towards,
  title  = {Towards Efficient Large Language Models for Scientific Text: A Review},
  author = {Huy Quoc To and Ming Liu and Guangyan Huang},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2408.10729},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.10729v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2408.10729.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2408.10729)

Discussion