Which Prosodic Features Matter Most for Pragmatics?

Nigel G. Ward, Divette Marco, Olac Fuentes
8/23/2024
cs.CLcs.SDeess.AS

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We investigate which prosodic features matter most in conveying prosodic functions. We use the problem of predicting human perceptions of pragmatic similarity among utterance pairs to evaluate the utility of prosodic features of different types. We find, for example, that duration-related features are more important than pitch-related features, and that utterance-initial features are more important than utterance-final features. Further, failure analysis indicates that modeling using pitch features only often fails to handle important pragmatic functions, and suggests that several generally-neglected acoustic and prosodic features are pragmatically significant, including nasality and vibrato. These findings can guide future basic research in prosody, and suggest how to improve speech synthesis evaluation, among other applications.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{ward2024which,
  title  = {Which Prosodic Features Matter Most for Pragmatics?},
  author = {Nigel G. Ward and Divette Marco and Olac Fuentes},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2408.13240},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.13240v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2408.13240.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2408.13240)

Discussion