Evaluating Computational Representations of Character: An Austen Character Similarity Benchmark

Funing Yang, Carolyn Jane Anderson
8/28/2024
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Several systems have been developed to extract information about characters to aid computational analysis of English literature. We propose character similarity grouping as a holistic evaluation task for these pipelines. We present AustenAlike, a benchmark suite of character similarities in Jane Austen's novels. Our benchmark draws on three notions of character similarity: a structurally defined notion of similarity; a socially defined notion of similarity; and an expert defined set extracted from literary criticism. We use AustenAlike to evaluate character features extracted using two pipelines, BookNLP and FanfictionNLP. We build character representations from four kinds of features and compare them to the three AustenAlike benchmarks and to GPT-4 similarity rankings. We find that though computational representations capture some broad similarities based on shared social and narrative roles, the expert pairings in our third benchmark are challenging for all systems, highlighting the subtler aspects of similarity noted by human readers.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{yang2024evaluating,
  title  = {Evaluating Computational Representations of Character: An Austen Character Similarity Benchmark},
  author = {Funing Yang and Carolyn Jane Anderson},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2408.16131},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.16131v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2408.16131.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2408.16131)

Discussion