The Many Faces of Optimal Weak-to-Strong Learning

Mikael Møller Høgsgaard, Kasper Green Larsen, Markus Engelund Mathiasen
8/30/2024
cs.LGcs.DS

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 3 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Boosting is an extremely successful idea, allowing one to combine multiple low accuracy classifiers into a much more accurate voting classifier. In this work, we present a new and surprisingly simple Boosting algorithm that obtains a provably optimal sample complexity. Sample optimal Boosting algorithms have only recently been developed, and our new algorithm has the fastest runtime among all such algorithms and is the simplest to describe: Partition your training data into 5 disjoint pieces of equal size, run AdaBoost on each, and combine the resulting classifiers via a majority vote. In addition to this theoretical contribution, we also perform the first empirical comparison of the proposed sample optimal Boosting algorithms. Our pilot empirical study suggests that our new algorithm might outperform previous algorithms on large data sets.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 3 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{hgsgaard2024many,
  title  = {The Many Faces of Optimal Weak-to-Strong Learning},
  author = {Mikael Møller Høgsgaard and Kasper Green Larsen and Markus Engelund Mathiasen},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2408.17148},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  doi    = {10.48550/arXiv.2408.17148},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.17148v1},
  journal = {NEURIPS 2024 2024}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2408.17148.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2408.17148)

Discussion