Understanding LLM Development Through Longitudinal Study: Insights from the Open Ko-LLM Leaderboard

Chanjun Park, Hyeonwoo Kim
9/5/2024
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

This paper conducts a longitudinal study over eleven months to address the limitations of prior research on the Open Ko-LLM Leaderboard, which have relied on empirical studies with restricted observation periods of only five months. By extending the analysis duration, we aim to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the progression in developing Korean large language models (LLMs). Our study is guided by three primary research questions: (1) What are the specific challenges in improving LLM performance across diverse tasks on the Open Ko-LLM Leaderboard over time? (2) How does model size impact task performance correlations across various benchmarks? (3) How have the patterns in leaderboard rankings shifted over time on the Open Ko-LLM Leaderboard?. By analyzing 1,769 models over this period, our research offers a comprehensive examination of the ongoing advancements in LLMs and the evolving nature of evaluation frameworks.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{park2024understanding,
  title  = {Understanding LLM Development Through Longitudinal Study: Insights from the Open Ko-LLM Leaderboard},
  author = {Chanjun Park and Hyeonwoo Kim},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2409.03257},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.03257v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2409.03257.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2409.03257)

Discussion