Privacy versus Emotion Preservation Trade-offs in Emotion-Preserving Speaker Anonymization

Zexin Cai, Henry Li Xinyuan, Ashi Garg, Leibny Paola García-Perera, Kevin Duh +3 more
9/5/2024
eess.AScs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Advances in speech technology now allow unprecedented access to personally identifiable information through speech. To protect such information, the differential privacy field has explored ways to anonymize speech while preserving its utility, including linguistic and paralinguistic aspects. However, anonymizing speech while maintaining emotional state remains challenging. We explore this problem in the context of the VoicePrivacy 2024 challenge. Specifically, we developed various speaker anonymization pipelines and find that approaches either excel at anonymization or preserving emotion state, but not both simultaneously. Achieving both would require an in-domain emotion recognizer. Additionally, we found that it is feasible to train a semi-effective speaker verification system using only emotion representations, demonstrating the challenge of separating these two modalities.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{cai2024privacy,
  title  = {Privacy versus Emotion Preservation Trade-offs in Emotion-Preserving Speaker Anonymization},
  author = {Zexin Cai and Henry Li Xinyuan and Ashi Garg and Leibny Paola García-Perera and Kevin Duh and Sanjeev Khudanpur and Nicholas Andrews and Matthew Wiesner},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2409.03655},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.03655v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2409.03655.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2409.03655)

Discussion