Understanding Fairness in Recommender Systems: A Healthcare Perspective

Veronica Kecki, Alan Said
9/5/2024
cs.LGcs.IR

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Fairness in AI-driven decision-making systems has become a critical concern, especially when these systems directly affect human lives. This paper explores the public's comprehension of fairness in healthcare recommendations. We conducted a survey where participants selected from four fairness metrics -- Demographic Parity, Equal Accuracy, Equalized Odds, and Positive Predictive Value -- across different healthcare scenarios to assess their understanding of these concepts. Our findings reveal that fairness is a complex and often misunderstood concept, with a generally low level of public understanding regarding fairness metrics in recommender systems. This study highlights the need for enhanced information and education on algorithmic fairness to support informed decision-making in using these systems. Furthermore, the results suggest that a one-size-fits-all approach to fairness may be insufficient, pointing to the importance of context-sensitive designs in developing equitable AI systems.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{kecki2024understanding,
  title  = {Understanding Fairness in Recommender Systems: A Healthcare Perspective},
  author = {Veronica Kecki and Alan Said},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2409.03893},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.03893v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2409.03893.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2409.03893)

Discussion