Explicit Mutual Information Maximization for Self-Supervised Learning

Lele Chang, Peilin Liu, Qinghai Guo, Fei Wen
9/7/2024
cs.CVcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Recently, self-supervised learning (SSL) has been extensively studied. Theoretically, mutual information maximization (MIM) is an optimal criterion for SSL, with a strong theoretical foundation in information theory. However, it is difficult to directly apply MIM in SSL since the data distribution is not analytically available in applications. In practice, many existing methods can be viewed as approximate implementations of the MIM criterion. This work shows that, based on the invariance property of MI, explicit MI maximization can be applied to SSL under a generic distribution assumption, i.e., a relaxed condition of the data distribution. We further illustrate this by analyzing the generalized Gaussian distribution. Based on this result, we derive a loss function based on the MIM criterion using only second-order statistics. We implement the new loss for SSL and demonstrate its effectiveness via extensive experiments.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{chang2024explicit,
  title  = {Explicit Mutual Information Maximization for Self-Supervised Learning},
  author = {Lele Chang and Peilin Liu and Qinghai Guo and Fei Wen},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2409.04747},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.04747v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2409.04747.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2409.04747)

Discussion