When resampling/reweighting improves feature learning in imbalanced classification?: A toy-model study

Tomoyuki Obuchi, Toshiyuki Tanaka
9/9/2024
stat.MLcond-mat.dis-nncs.IT

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 5 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

A toy model of binary classification is studied with the aim of clarifying the class-wise resampling/reweighting effect on the feature learning performance under the presence of class imbalance. In the analysis, a high-dimensional limit of the input space is taken while keeping the ratio of the dataset size against the input dimension finite and the non-rigorous replica method from statistical mechanics is employed. The result shows that there exists a case in which the no resampling/reweighting situation gives the best feature learning performance irrespectively of the choice of losses or classifiers, supporting recent findings in Cao et al. (2019); Kang et al. (2019). It is also revealed that the key of the result is the symmetry of the loss and the problem setting. Inspired by this, we propose a further simplified model exhibiting the same property in the multiclass setting. These clarify when the class-wise resampling/reweighting becomes effective in imbalanced classification.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 5 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{obuchi2024when,
  title  = {When resampling/reweighting improves feature learning in imbalanced classification?: A toy-model study},
  author = {Tomoyuki Obuchi and Toshiyuki Tanaka},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2409.05598},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.05598v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2409.05598.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2409.05598)

Discussion