Ensuring Fairness with Transparent Auditing of Quantitative Bias in AI Systems

Chih-Cheng Rex Yuan, Bow-Yaw Wang
8/24/2024
cs.CYcs.AIcs.HC

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 3 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

With the rapid advancement of AI, there is a growing trend to integrate AI into decision-making processes. However, AI systems may exhibit biases that lead decision-makers to draw unfair conclusions. Notably, the COMPAS system used in the American justice system to evaluate recidivism was found to favor racial majority groups; specifically, it violates a fairness standard called equalized odds. Various measures have been proposed to assess AI fairness. We present a framework for auditing AI fairness, involving third-party auditors and AI system providers, and we have created a tool to facilitate systematic examination of AI systems. The tool is open-sourced and publicly available. Unlike traditional AI systems, we advocate a transparent white-box and statistics-based approach. It can be utilized by third-party auditors, AI developers, or the general public for reference when judging the fairness criterion of AI systems.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 3 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{yuan2024ensuring,
  title  = {Ensuring Fairness with Transparent Auditing of Quantitative Bias in AI Systems},
  author = {Chih-Cheng Rex Yuan and Bow-Yaw Wang},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2409.06708},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.06708v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2409.06708.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2409.06708)

Discussion