Understanding Foundation Models: Are We Back in 1924?

Alan F. Smeaton
9/11/2024
cs.AIcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 3 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

This position paper explores the rapid development of Foundation Models (FMs) in AI and their implications for intelligence and reasoning. It examines the characteristics of FMs, including their training on vast datasets and use of embedding spaces to capture semantic relationships. The paper discusses recent advancements in FMs' reasoning abilities which we argue cannot be attributed to increased model size but to novel training techniques which yield learning phenomena like grokking. It also addresses the challenges in benchmarking FMs and compares their structure to the human brain. We argue that while FMs show promising developments in reasoning and knowledge representation, understanding their inner workings remains a significant challenge, similar to ongoing efforts in neuroscience to comprehend human brain function. Despite having some similarities, fundamental differences between FMs and the structure of human brain warn us against making direct comparisons or expecting neuroscience to provide immediate insights into FM function.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 3 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{smeaton2024understanding,
  title  = {Understanding Foundation Models: Are We Back in 1924?},
  author = {Alan F. Smeaton},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2409.07618},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.07618v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2409.07618.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2409.07618)

Discussion