Hierarchical Narrative Analysis: Unraveling Perceptions of Generative AI

Riona Matsuoka, Hiroki Matsumoto, Takahiro Yoshida, Tomohiro Watanabe, Ryoma Kondo +1 more
9/17/2024
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Written texts reflect an author's perspective, making the thorough analysis of literature a key research method in fields such as the humanities and social sciences. However, conventional text mining techniques like sentiment analysis and topic modeling are limited in their ability to capture the hierarchical narrative structures that reveal deeper argumentative patterns. To address this gap, we propose a method that leverages large language models (LLMs) to extract and organize these structures into a hierarchical framework. We validate this approach by analyzing public opinions on generative AI collected by Japan's Agency for Cultural Affairs, comparing the narratives of supporters and critics. Our analysis provides clearer visualization of the factors influencing divergent opinions on generative AI, offering deeper insights into the structures of agreement and disagreement.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{matsuoka2024hierarchical,
  title  = {Hierarchical Narrative Analysis: Unraveling Perceptions of Generative AI},
  author = {Riona Matsuoka and Hiroki Matsumoto and Takahiro Yoshida and Tomohiro Watanabe and Ryoma Kondo and Ryohei Hisano},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2409.11032},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.11032v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2409.11032.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2409.11032)

Discussion