Machine Learning and Theory Ladenness -- A Phenomenological Account

Alberto Termine, Emanuele Ratti, Alessandro Facchini
9/17/2024
cs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We provide an analysis of theory ladenness in machine learning in science, where "theory", that we call "domain theory", refers to the domain knowledge of the scientific discipline where ML is used. By constructing an account of ML models based on a comparison with phenomenological models, we show, against recent trends in philosophy of science, that ML model-building is mostly indifferent to domain theory, even if the model remains theory laden in a weak sense, which we call theory infection. These claims, we argue, have far-reaching consequences for the transferability of ML across scientific disciplines, and shift the priorities of the debate on theory ladenness in ML from descriptive to normative.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{termine2024machine,
  title  = {Machine Learning and Theory Ladenness -- A Phenomenological Account},
  author = {Alberto Termine and Emanuele Ratti and Alessandro Facchini},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2409.11277},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.11277v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2409.11277.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2409.11277)

Discussion