Textualized Agent-Style Reasoning for Complex Tasks by Multiple Round LLM Generation

Chen Liang, Zhifan Feng, Zihe Liu, Wenbin Jiang, Jinan Xu +2 more
9/19/2024
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Chain-of-thought prompting significantly boosts the reasoning ability of large language models but still faces three issues: hallucination problem, restricted interpretability, and uncontrollable generation. To address these challenges, we present AgentCOT, a llm-based autonomous agent framework, which can solve complex problems in an agent-style manner by multiple round LLM generation. At each step, AgentCOT selects an action and executes it to yield an intermediate result with supporting evidence. In addition, we integrate the step's index into the reasoning process to form a graph structure for complex inference logic. We introduce two new strategies to enhance the performance of AgentCOT.We conduct extensive experiments to verify the effectiveness of our method on six common benchmarks. Results exhibit that our method brings in substantial improvements over current competitive approaches.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{liang2024textualized,
  title  = {Textualized Agent-Style Reasoning for Complex Tasks by Multiple Round LLM Generation},
  author = {Chen Liang and Zhifan Feng and Zihe Liu and Wenbin Jiang and Jinan Xu and Yufeng Chen and Yong Wang},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2409.12411},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.12411v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2409.12411.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2409.12411)

Discussion