EmotionQueen: A Benchmark for Evaluating Empathy of Large Language Models

Yuyan Chen, Hao Wang, Songzhou Yan, Sijia Liu, Yueze Li +2 more
9/20/2024
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Emotional intelligence in large language models (LLMs) is of great importance in Natural Language Processing. However, the previous research mainly focus on basic sentiment analysis tasks, such as emotion recognition, which is not enough to evaluate LLMs' overall emotional intelligence. Therefore, this paper presents a novel framework named EmotionQueen for evaluating the emotional intelligence of LLMs. The framework includes four distinctive tasks: Key Event Recognition, Mixed Event Recognition, Implicit Emotional Recognition, and Intention Recognition. LLMs are requested to recognize important event or implicit emotions and generate empathetic response. We also design two metrics to evaluate LLMs' capabilities in recognition and response for emotion-related statements. Experiments yield significant conclusions about LLMs' capabilities and limitations in emotion intelligence.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{chen2024emotionqueen,
  title  = {EmotionQueen: A Benchmark for Evaluating Empathy of Large Language Models},
  author = {Yuyan Chen and Hao Wang and Songzhou Yan and Sijia Liu and Yueze Li and Yi Zhao and Yanghua Xiao},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2409.13359},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.13359v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2409.13359.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2409.13359)

Discussion