Method of Equal Shares with Bounded Overspending

Georgios Papasotiropoulos, Seyedeh Zeinab Pishbin, Oskar Skibski, Piotr Skowron, Tomasz Wąs
9/23/2024
cs.GTcs.AIcs.MA

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

In participatory budgeting (PB), voters decide through voting which subset of projects to fund within a given budget. Proportionality in the context of PB is crucial to ensure equal treatment of all groups of voters. However, pure proportional rules can sometimes lead to suboptimal outcomes. We introduce the Method of Equal Shares with Bounded Overspending (BOS Equal Shares), a robust variant of Equal Shares that balances proportionality and efficiency. BOS Equal Shares addresses inefficiencies implied by strict proportionality axioms, yet the rule still provides fairness guarantees, similar to the original Method of Equal Shares. Our extensive empirical analysis on real-world PB instances shows excellent performance of BOS Equal Shares across several metrics. In the course of the analysis, we also present and examine a fractional variant of the Method of Equal Shares which allows for partial funding of projects.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{papasotiropoulos2024method,
  title  = {Method of Equal Shares with Bounded Overspending},
  author = {Georgios Papasotiropoulos and Seyedeh Zeinab Pishbin and Oskar Skibski and Piotr Skowron and Tomasz Wąs},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2409.15005},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.15005v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2409.15005.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2409.15005)

Discussion