Revealing an Unattractivity Bias in Mental Reconstruction of Occluded Faces using Generative Image Models

Frederik Riedmann, Bernhard Egger, Tim Rohe
9/23/2024
cs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that faces are rated as more attractive when they are partially occluded. The cause of this observation remains unclear. One explanation is a mental reconstruction of the occluded face parts which is biased towards a more attractive percept as shown in face-attractiveness rating tasks. We aimed to test for this hypothesis by using a delayed matching-to-sample task, which directly requires mental reconstruction. In two online experiments, we presented observers with unattractive, neutral or attractive synthetic reconstructions of the occluded face parts using a state-of-the-art diffusion-based image generator. Our experiments do not support the initial hypothesis and reveal an unattractiveness bias for occluded faces instead. This suggests that facial attractiveness rating tasks do not prompt reconstructions. Rather, the attractivity bias may arise from global image features, and faces may actually be reconstructed with unattractive properties when mental reconstruction is applied.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{riedmann2024revealing,
  title  = {Revealing an Unattractivity Bias in Mental Reconstruction of Occluded Faces using Generative Image Models},
  author = {Frederik Riedmann and Bernhard Egger and Tim Rohe},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2409.15443},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.15443v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2409.15443.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2409.15443)

Discussion