ForecastBench: A Dynamic Benchmark of AI Forecasting Capabilities

Ezra Karger, Houtan Bastani, Chen Yueh-Han, Zachary Jacobs, Danny Halawi +2 more
2/12/2026

No official code found. Best implementation: forecastingresearch/forecastbench (69 stars, MIT, last commit 2026-04-29).

Abstract

Forecasts of future events are essential inputs into informed decision-making. Machine learning (ML) systems have the potential to deliver forecasts at scale, but there is no framework for evaluating the accuracy of ML systems on a standardized set of forecasting questions. To address this gap, we introduce ForecastBench: a dynamic benchmark that evaluates the accuracy of ML systems on an automatically generated and regularly updated set of 1,000 forecasting questions. To avoid any possibility of data leakage, ForecastBench is comprised solely of questions about future events that have no known answer at the time of submission. We quantify the capabilities of current ML systems by collecting forecasts from expert (human) forecasters, the general public, and LLMs on a random subset of questions from the benchmark ($N=200$). While LLMs have achieved super-human performance on many benchmarks, they perform less well here: expert forecasters outperform the top-performing LLM ($p$-value $<0.001$). We display system and human scores in a public leaderboard at www.forecastbench.org.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

MIT

A dynamic forecasting benchmark for LLMs

6916R, TeXMar 15, 20245 months agoMIT
benchmarkforecastbenchforecastingllm-benchmarking

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{karger2026forecastbench,
  title  = {ForecastBench: A Dynamic Benchmark of AI Forecasting Capabilities},
  author = {Ezra Karger and Houtan Bastani and Chen Yueh-Han and Zachary Jacobs and Danny Halawi and Fred Zhang and P. Tetlock},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2409.19839},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.19839},
  journal = {ICLR 2024 2024}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2409.19839.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2409.19839)

Discussion