Locating Information Gaps and Narrative Inconsistencies Across Languages: A Case Study of LGBT People Portrayals on Wikipedia

Farhan Samir, Chan Young Park, Anjalie Field, Vered Shwartz, Yulia Tsvetkov
10/5/2024
cs.CL

No official code found. Best implementation: smfsamir/infogap (9 stars, last commit 2025-10-22).

Abstract

To explain social phenomena and identify systematic biases, much research in computational social science focuses on comparative text analyses. These studies often rely on coarse corpus-level statistics or local word-level analyses, mainly in English. We introduce the InfoGap method -- an efficient and reliable approach to locating information gaps and inconsistencies in articles at the fact level, across languages. We evaluate InfoGap by analyzing LGBT people's portrayals, across 2.7K biography pages on English, Russian, and French Wikipedias. We find large discrepancies in factual coverage across the languages. Moreover, our analysis reveals that biographical facts carrying negative connotations are more likely to be highlighted in Russian Wikipedia. Crucially, InfoGap both facilitates large scale analyses, and pinpoints local document- and fact-level information gaps, laying a new foundation for targeted and nuanced comparative language analysis at scale.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

smfsamir/infogapCommunity100%
96PythonOct 3, 202412 months ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{samir2024locating,
  title  = {Locating Information Gaps and Narrative Inconsistencies Across Languages: A Case Study of LGBT People Portrayals on Wikipedia},
  author = {Farhan Samir and Chan Young Park and Anjalie Field and Vered Shwartz and Yulia Tsvetkov},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2410.04282},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.04282v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2410.04282.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2410.04282)

Discussion