MVG-CRPS: A Robust Loss Function for Multivariate Probabilistic Forecasting

Vincent Zhihao Zheng, Lijun Sun
10/11/2024
stat.MLcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Multivariate Gaussian (MVG) distributions are central to modeling correlated continuous variables in probabilistic forecasting. Neural forecasting models typically parameterize the mean vector and covariance matrix of the distribution using neural networks, optimizing with the log-score (negative log-likelihood) as the loss function. However, the sensitivity of the log-score to outliers can lead to significant errors in the presence of anomalies. Drawing on the continuous ranked probability score (CRPS) for univariate distributions, we propose MVG-CRPS, a strictly proper scoring rule for MVG distributions. MVG-CRPS admits a closed-form expression in terms of neural network outputs, thereby integrating seamlessly into deep learning frameworks. Experiments on real-world datasets across multivariate autoregressive and univariate sequence-to-sequence (Seq2Seq) forecasting tasks show that MVG-CRPS improves robustness, accuracy, and uncertainty quantification in probabilistic forecasting.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zheng2024mvgcrps,
  title  = {MVG-CRPS: A Robust Loss Function for Multivariate Probabilistic Forecasting},
  author = {Vincent Zhihao Zheng and Lijun Sun},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2410.09133},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.09133v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2410.09133.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2410.09133)

Discussion