Preserving Old Memories in Vivid Detail: Human-Interactive Photo Restoration Framework

Seung-Yeon Back, Geonho Son, Dahye Jeong, Eunil Park, Simon S. Woo
10/12/2024
cs.CVcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Photo restoration technology enables preserving visual memories in photographs. However, physical prints are vulnerable to various forms of deterioration, ranging from physical damage to loss of image quality, etc. While restoration by human experts can improve the quality of outcomes, it often comes at a high price in terms of cost and time for restoration. In this work, we present the AI-based photo restoration framework composed of multiple stages, where each stage is tailored to enhance and restore specific types of photo damage, accelerating and automating the photo restoration process. By integrating these techniques into a unified architecture, our framework aims to offer a one-stop solution for restoring old and deteriorated photographs. Furthermore, we present a novel old photo restoration dataset because we lack a publicly available dataset for our evaluation.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{back2024preserving,
  title  = {Preserving Old Memories in Vivid Detail: Human-Interactive Photo Restoration Framework},
  author = {Seung-Yeon Back and Geonho Son and Dahye Jeong and Eunil Park and Simon S. Woo},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2410.09529},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.09529v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2410.09529.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2410.09529)

Discussion