A Step Towards Mixture of Grader: Statistical Analysis of Existing Automatic Evaluation Metrics

Yun Joon Soh, Jishen Zhao
10/13/2024
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 4 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

The explosion of open-sourced models and Question-Answering (QA) datasets emphasizes the importance of automated QA evaluation. We studied the statistics of the existing evaluation metrics for a better understanding of their limitations. By measuring the correlation coefficients of each evaluation metric concerning human-like evaluation score, we observed the following: (1) existing metrics have a high correlation among them concerning the question type (e.g., single word, single phrase, etc.), (2) no single metric can adequately estimate the human-like evaluation. As a potential solution, we discuss how a Mixture Of Grader could potentially improve the auto QA evaluator quality.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 4 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{soh2024step,
  title  = {A Step Towards Mixture of Grader: Statistical Analysis of Existing Automatic Evaluation Metrics},
  author = {Yun Joon Soh and Jishen Zhao},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2410.10030},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10030v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2410.10030.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2410.10030)

Discussion