Stationary Velocity Fields on Matrix Groups for Deformable Image Registration

Johannes Bostelmann, Ole Gildemeister, Jan Lellmann
10/14/2024
cs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

The stationary velocity field (SVF) approach allows to build parametrizations of invertible deformation fields, which is often a desirable property in image registration. Its expressiveness is particularly attractive when used as a block following a machine learning-inspired network. However, it can struggle with large deformations. We extend the SVF approach to matrix groups, in particular $\SE(3)$. This moves Euclidean transformations into the low-frequency part, towards which network architectures are often naturally biased, so that larger motions can be recovered more easily. This requires an extension of the flow equation, for which we provide sufficient conditions for existence. We further prove a decomposition condition that allows us to apply a scaling-and-squaring approach for efficient numerical integration of the flow equation. We numerically validate the approach on inter-patient registration of 3D MRI images of the human brain.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{bostelmann2024stationary,
  title  = {Stationary Velocity Fields on Matrix Groups for Deformable Image Registration},
  author = {Johannes Bostelmann and Ole Gildemeister and Jan Lellmann},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2410.10997},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10997v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2410.10997.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2410.10997)

Discussion