Is Complex Query Answering Really Complex?

Cosimo Gregucci, Bo Xiong, Daniel Hernandez, Lorenzo Loconte, Pasquale Minervini +2 more
10/16/2024
cs.LGcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Complex query answering (CQA) on knowledge graphs (KGs) is gaining momentum as a challenging reasoning task. In this paper, we show that the current benchmarks for CQA might not be as complex as we think, as the way they are built distorts our perception of progress in this field. For example, we find that in these benchmarks, most queries (up to 98% for some query types) can be reduced to simpler problems, e.g., link prediction, where only one link needs to be predicted. The performance of state-of-the-art CQA models decreases significantly when such models are evaluated on queries that cannot be reduced to easier types. Thus, we propose a set of more challenging benchmarks composed of queries that require models to reason over multiple hops and better reflect the construction of real-world KGs. In a systematic empirical investigation, the new benchmarks show that current methods leave much to be desired from current CQA methods.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{gregucci2024complex,
  title  = {Is Complex Query Answering Really Complex?},
  author = {Cosimo Gregucci and Bo Xiong and Daniel Hernandez and Lorenzo Loconte and Pasquale Minervini and Steffen Staab and Antonio Vergari},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2410.12537},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.12537v3},
  journal = {ICML 2024 2024}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2410.12537.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2410.12537)

Discussion