The Bayesian Confidence (BACON) Estimator for Deep Neural Networks

Patrick D. Kee, Max J. Brown, Jonathan C. Rice, Christian A. Howell
10/16/2024
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

This paper introduces the Bayesian Confidence Estimator (BACON) for deep neural networks. Current practice of interpreting Softmax values in the output layer as probabilities of outcomes is prone to extreme predictions of class probability. In this work we extend Waagen's method of representing the terminal layers with a geometric model, where the probability associated with an output vector is estimated with Bayes' Rule using validation data to provide likelihood and normalization values. This estimator provides superior ECE and ACE calibration error compared to Softmax for ResNet-18 at 85% network accuracy, and EfficientNet-B0 at 95% network accuracy, on the CIFAR-10 dataset with an imbalanced test set, except for very high accuracy edge cases. In addition, when using the ACE metric, BACON demonstrated improved calibration error when estimating probabilities for the imbalanced test set when using actual class distribution fractions.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{kee2024bayesian,
  title  = {The Bayesian Confidence (BACON) Estimator for Deep Neural Networks},
  author = {Patrick D. Kee and Max J. Brown and Jonathan C. Rice and Christian A. Howell},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2410.12604},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.12604v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2410.12604.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2410.12604)

Discussion