signwriting-evaluation: Effective Sign Language Evaluation via SignWriting

Amit Moryossef, Rotem Zilberman, Ohad Langer
10/17/2024
cs.CL

Official code: sign-language-processing/signwriting-evaluation (4 stars, last commit 2026-02-10).

Abstract

The lack of automatic evaluation metrics tailored for SignWriting presents a significant obstacle in developing effective transcription and translation models for signed languages. This paper introduces a comprehensive suite of evaluation metrics specifically designed for SignWriting, including adaptations of standard metrics such as \texttt{BLEU} and \texttt{chrF}, the application of \texttt{CLIPScore} to SignWriting images, and a novel symbol distance metric unique to our approach. We address the distinct challenges of evaluating single signs versus continuous signing and provide qualitative demonstrations of metric efficacy through score distribution analyses and nearest-neighbor searches within the SignBank corpus. Our findings reveal the strengths and limitations of each metric, offering valuable insights for future advancements using SignWriting. This work contributes essential tools for evaluating SignWriting models, facilitating progress in the field of sign language processing. Our code is available at \url{https://github.com/sign-language-processing/signwriting-evaluation}.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

Automatic Evaluation for SignWriting Machine Learning Outputs

42PythonDec 30, 20238 months ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{moryossef2024signwritingevaluation,
  title  = {signwriting-evaluation: Effective Sign Language Evaluation via SignWriting},
  author = {Amit Moryossef and Rotem Zilberman and Ohad Langer},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2410.13668},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.13668v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2410.13668.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2410.13668)

Discussion