A Novel Method to Metigate Demographic and Expert Bias in ICD Coding with Causal Inference

Bin Zhang, Junli Wang
10/18/2024
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

ICD(International Classification of Diseases) coding involves assigning ICD codes to patients visit based on their medical notes. Considering ICD coding as a multi-label text classification task, researchers have developed sophisticated methods. Despite progress, these models often suffer from label imbalance and may develop spurious correlations with demographic factors. Additionally, while human coders assign ICD codes, the inclusion of irrelevant information from unrelated experts introduces biases. To combat these issues, we propose a novel method to mitigate Demographic and Expert biases in ICD coding through Causal Inference (DECI). We provide a novel causality-based interpretation in ICD Coding that models make predictions by three distinct pathways. And based counterfactual reasoning, DECI mitigate demographic and expert biases. Experimental results show that DECI outperforms state-of-the-art models, offering a significant advancement in accurate and unbiased ICD coding.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zhang2024novel,
  title  = {A Novel Method to Metigate Demographic and Expert Bias in ICD Coding with Causal Inference},
  author = {Bin Zhang and Junli Wang},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2410.14236},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.14236v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2410.14236.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2410.14236)

Discussion