Generative AI, Pragmatics, and Authenticity in Second Language Learning

Robert Godwin-Jones`
10/18/2024
cs.CLcs.AIcs.HC

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

There are obvious benefits to integrating generative AI (artificial intelligence) into language learning and teaching. Those include using AI as a language tutor, creating learning materials, or assessing learner output. However, due to how AI systems under-stand human language, based on a mathematical model using statistical probability, they lack the lived experience to be able to use language with the same social aware-ness as humans. Additionally, there are built-in linguistic and cultural biases based on their training data which is mostly in English and predominantly from Western sources. Those facts limit AI suitability for some language learning interactions. Stud-ies have clearly shown that systems such as ChatGPT often do not produce language that is pragmatically appropriate. The lack of linguistic and cultural authenticity has important implications for how AI is integrated into second language acquisition as well as in instruction targeting development of intercultural communication compe-tence.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{godwinjones2024generative,
  title  = {Generative AI, Pragmatics, and Authenticity in Second Language Learning},
  author = {Robert Godwin-Jones`},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2410.14395},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.14395v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2410.14395.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2410.14395)

Discussion