Which LLMs are Difficult to Detect? A Detailed Analysis of Potential Factors Contributing to Difficulties in LLM Text Detection

Shantanu Thorat, Tianbao Yang
10/18/2024
cs.CLcs.LG

No official code found. Best implementation: ShantanuT01/which-llms-are-difficult-to-detect (0 stars, MIT, last commit 2024-10-22).

Abstract

As LLMs increase in accessibility, LLM-generated texts have proliferated across several fields, such as scientific, academic, and creative writing. However, LLMs are not created equally; they may have different architectures and training datasets. Thus, some LLMs may be more challenging to detect than others. Using two datasets spanning four total writing domains, we train AI-generated (AIG) text classifiers using the LibAUC library - a deep learning library for training classifiers with imbalanced datasets. Our results in the Deepfake Text dataset show that AIG-text detection varies across domains, with scientific writing being relatively challenging. In the Rewritten Ivy Panda (RIP) dataset focusing on student essays, we find that the OpenAI family of LLMs was substantially difficult for our classifiers to distinguish from human texts. Additionally, we explore possible factors that could explain the difficulties in detecting OpenAI-generated texts.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

MIT
00Python, Jupyter NotebookSep 19, 20241 years agoMIT

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{thorat2024which,
  title  = {Which LLMs are Difficult to Detect? A Detailed Analysis of Potential Factors Contributing to Difficulties in LLM Text Detection},
  author = {Shantanu Thorat and Tianbao Yang},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2410.14875},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.14875v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2410.14875.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2410.14875)

Discussion