Polyp-E: Benchmarking the Robustness of Deep Segmentation Models via Polyp Editing

Runpu Wei, Zijin Yin, Kongming Liang, Min Min, Chengwei Pan +4 more
10/22/2024
cs.CV

No official code found. Best implementation: RunpuWei/Polyp-E-Benchmark (1 star, last commit 2025-01-31).

Abstract

Automatic polyp segmentation is helpful to assist clinical diagnosis and treatment. In daily clinical practice, clinicians exhibit robustness in identifying polyps with both location and size variations. It is uncertain if deep segmentation models can achieve comparable robustness in automated colonoscopic analysis. To benchmark the model robustness, we focus on evaluating the robustness of segmentation models on the polyps with various attributes (e.g. location and size) and healthy samples. Based on the Latent Diffusion Model, we perform attribute editing on real polyps and build a new dataset named Polyp-E. Our synthetic dataset boasts exceptional realism, to the extent that clinical experts find it challenging to discern them from real data. We evaluate several existing polyp segmentation models on the proposed benchmark. The results reveal most of the models are highly sensitive to attribute variations. As a novel data augmentation technique, the proposed editing pipeline can improve both in-distribution and out-of-distribution generalization ability. The code and datasets will be released.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

BIBM 2024 -- Polyp-E: Benchmarking the Robustness of Deep Segmentation Models via Polyp Editing

10Oct 26, 20241 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{wei2024polype,
  title  = {Polyp-E: Benchmarking the Robustness of Deep Segmentation Models via Polyp Editing},
  author = {Runpu Wei and Zijin Yin and Kongming Liang and Min Min and Chengwei Pan and Gang Yu and Haonan Huang and Yan Liu and Zhanyu Ma},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2410.16732},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.16732v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2410.16732.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2410.16732)

Discussion