Publishing Neural Networks in Drug Discovery Might Compromise Training Data Privacy

Fabian P. Krüger, Johan Östman, Lewis Mervin, Igor V. Tetko, Ola Engkvist
10/22/2024
cs.CRcs.LG

No official code found. Best implementation: aidotse/LeakPro (24 stars, Apache-2.0, last commit 2026-04-28). 1 more below.

Abstract

This study investigates the risks of exposing confidential chemical structures when machine learning models trained on these structures are made publicly available. We use membership inference attacks, a common method to assess privacy that is largely unexplored in the context of drug discovery, to examine neural networks for molecular property prediction in a black-box setting. Our results reveal significant privacy risks across all evaluated datasets and neural network architectures. Combining multiple attacks increases these risks. Molecules from minority classes, often the most valuable in drug discovery, are particularly vulnerable. We also found that representing molecules as graphs and using message-passing neural networks may mitigate these risks. We provide a framework to assess privacy risks of classification models and molecular representations. Our findings highlight the need for careful consideration when sharing neural networks trained on proprietary chemical structures, informing organisations and researchers about the trade-offs between data confidentiality and model openness.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(2)

aidotse/LeakProCommunity100%
Apache-2.0
2430C, PythonNov 21, 20235 months agoApache-2.0
MIT
22PythonOct 15, 20241 years agoMIT

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{krger2024publishing,
  title  = {Publishing Neural Networks in Drug Discovery Might Compromise Training Data Privacy},
  author = {Fabian P. Krüger and Johan Östman and Lewis Mervin and Igor V. Tetko and Ola Engkvist},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2410.16975},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.16975v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2410.16975.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2410.16975)

Discussion