Are Visual-Language Models Effective in Action Recognition? A Comparative Study

Mahmoud Ali, Di Yang, François Brémond
10/22/2024
cs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Current vision-language foundation models, such as CLIP, have recently shown significant improvement in performance across various downstream tasks. However, whether such foundation models significantly improve more complex fine-grained action recognition tasks is still an open question. To answer this question and better find out the future research direction on human behavior analysis in-the-wild, this paper provides a large-scale study and insight on current state-of-the-art vision foundation models by comparing their transfer ability onto zero-shot and frame-wise action recognition tasks. Extensive experiments are conducted on recent fine-grained, human-centric action recognition datasets (e.g., Toyota Smarthome, Penn Action, UAV-Human, TSU, Charades) including action classification and segmentation.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{ali2024visuallanguage,
  title  = {Are Visual-Language Models Effective in Action Recognition? A Comparative Study},
  author = {Mahmoud Ali and Di Yang and François Brémond},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2410.17149},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.17149v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2410.17149.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2410.17149)

Discussion