MILES: Making Imitation Learning Easy with Self-Supervision

Georgios Papagiannis, Edward Johns
10/25/2024
cs.ROcs.AIcs.LG

No official code found. Best implementation: gpapagiannis/miles-imitation (19 stars, last commit 2024-11-14).

Abstract

Data collection in imitation learning often requires significant, laborious human supervision, such as numerous demonstrations, and/or frequent environment resets for methods that incorporate reinforcement learning. In this work, we propose an alternative approach, MILES: a fully autonomous, self-supervised data collection paradigm, and we show that this enables efficient policy learning from just a single demonstration and a single environment reset. MILES autonomously learns a policy for returning to and then following the single demonstration, whilst being self-guided during data collection, eliminating the need for additional human interventions. We evaluated MILES across several real-world tasks, including tasks that require precise contact-rich manipulation such as locking a lock with a key. We found that, under the constraints of a single demonstration and no repeated environment resetting, MILES significantly outperforms state-of-the-art alternatives like imitation learning methods that leverage reinforcement learning. Videos of our experiments and code can be found on our webpage: www.robot-learning.uk/miles.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

Template Code for the Paper: MILES: Making Imitation Learning Easy with Self-Supervision

190PythonNov 11, 20241 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{papagiannis2024miles,
  title  = {MILES: Making Imitation Learning Easy with Self-Supervision},
  author = {Georgios Papagiannis and Edward Johns},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2410.19693},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.19693v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2410.19693.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2410.19693)

Discussion