Do Discrete Self-Supervised Representations of Speech Capture Tone Distinctions?

Opeyemi Osakuade, Simon King
10/25/2024
cs.CLcs.SDeess.AS

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Discrete representations of speech, obtained from Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) foundation models, are widely used, especially where there are limited data for the downstream task, such as for a low-resource language. Typically, discretization of speech into a sequence of symbols is achieved by unsupervised clustering of the latents from an SSL model. Our study evaluates whether discrete symbols - found using k-means - adequately capture tone in two example languages, Mandarin and Yoruba. We compare latent vectors with discrete symbols, obtained from HuBERT base, MandarinHuBERT, or XLS-R, for vowel and tone classification. We find that using discrete symbols leads to a substantial loss of tone information, even for language-specialised SSL models. We suggest that discretization needs to be task-aware, particularly for tone-dependent downstream tasks.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{osakuade2024discrete,
  title  = {Do Discrete Self-Supervised Representations of Speech Capture Tone Distinctions?},
  author = {Opeyemi Osakuade and Simon King},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2410.19935},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.19935v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2410.19935.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2410.19935)

Discussion