Generative linguistics contribution to artificial intelligence: Where this contribution lies?

Mohammed Q. Shormani
10/26/2024
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

This article aims to characterize Generative linguistics (GL) contribution to artificial intelligence (AI), alluding to the debate among linguists and AI scientists on whether linguistics belongs to humanities or science. In this article, I will try not to be biased as a linguist, studying the phenomenon from an independent scientific perspective. The article walks the researcher/reader through the scientific theorems and rationales involved in AI which belong from GL, specifically the Chomsky School. It, thus, provides good evidence from syntax, semantics, language faculty, Universal Grammar, computational system of human language, language acquisition, human brain, programming languages (e.g. Python), Large Language Models, and unbiased AI scientists that this contribution is huge, and that this contribution cannot be denied. It concludes that however the huge GL contribution to AI, there are still points of divergence including the nature and type of language input.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{shormani2024generative,
  title  = {Generative linguistics contribution to artificial intelligence: Where this contribution lies?},
  author = {Mohammed Q. Shormani},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2410.20221},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.20221v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2410.20221.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2410.20221)

Discussion