Structured Analysis and Comparison of Alphabets in Historical Handwritten Ciphers

Martín Méndez, Pau Torras, Adrià Molina, Jialuo Chen, Oriol Ramos-Terrades +1 more
10/29/2024
cs.CVcs.DL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Historical ciphered manuscripts are documents that were typically used in sensitive communications within military and diplomatic contexts or among members of secret societies. These secret messages were concealed by inventing a method of writing employing symbols from diverse sources such as digits, alchemy signs and Latin or Greek characters. When studying a new, unseen cipher, the automatic search and grouping of ciphers with a similar alphabet can aid the scholar in its transcription and cryptanalysis because it indicates a probability that the underlying cipher is similar. In this study, we address this need by proposing the CSI metric, a novel way of comparing pairs of ciphered documents. We assess their effectiveness in an unsupervised clustering scenario utilising visual features, including SIFT, pre-trained learnt embeddings, and OCR descriptors.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{mndez2024structured,
  title  = {Structured Analysis and Comparison of Alphabets in Historical Handwritten Ciphers},
  author = {Martín Méndez and Pau Torras and Adrià Molina and Jialuo Chen and Oriol Ramos-Terrades and Alicia Fornés},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2410.21913},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21913v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2410.21913.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2410.21913)

Discussion