Auditing f-Differential Privacy in One Run

Saeed Mahloujifar, Luca Melis, Kamalika Chaudhuri
10/29/2024
cs.LGcs.CR

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Empirical auditing has emerged as a means of catching some of the flaws in the implementation of privacy-preserving algorithms. Existing auditing mechanisms, however, are either computationally inefficient requiring multiple runs of the machine learning algorithms or suboptimal in calculating an empirical privacy. In this work, we present a tight and efficient auditing procedure and analysis that can effectively assess the privacy of mechanisms. Our approach is efficient; similar to the recent work of Steinke, Nasr, and Jagielski (2023), our auditing procedure leverages the randomness of examples in the input dataset and requires only a single run of the target mechanism. And it is more accurate; we provide a novel analysis that enables us to achieve tight empirical privacy estimates by using the hypothesized $f$-DP curve of the mechanism, which provides a more accurate measure of privacy than the traditional $ε,δ$ differential privacy parameters. We use our auditing procure and analysis to obtain empirical privacy, demonstrating that our auditing procedure delivers tighter privacy estimates.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{mahloujifar2024auditing,
  title  = {Auditing f-Differential Privacy in One Run},
  author = {Saeed Mahloujifar and Luca Melis and Kamalika Chaudhuri},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2410.22235},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.22235v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2410.22235.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2410.22235)

Discussion