Integrating Fuzzy Logic into Deep Symbolic Regression

Wout Gerdes, Erman Acar
11/1/2024
cs.AIcs.LOcs.SC

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Credit card fraud detection is a critical concern for financial institutions, intensified by the rise of contactless payment technologies. While deep learning models offer high accuracy, their lack of explainability poses significant challenges in financial settings. This paper explores the integration of fuzzy logic into Deep Symbolic Regression (DSR) to enhance both performance and explainability in fraud detection. We investigate the effectiveness of different fuzzy logic implications, specifically Łukasiewicz, Gödel, and Product, in handling the complexity and uncertainty of fraud detection datasets. Our analysis suggest that the Łukasiewicz implication achieves the highest F1-score and overall accuracy, while the Product implication offers a favorable balance between performance and explainability. Despite having a performance lower than state-of-the-art (SOTA) models due to information loss in data transformation, our approach provides novelty and insights into into integrating fuzzy logic into DSR for fraud detection, providing a comprehensive comparison between different implications and methods.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{gerdes2024integrating,
  title  = {Integrating Fuzzy Logic into Deep Symbolic Regression},
  author = {Wout Gerdes and Erman Acar},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2411.00431},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.00431v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2411.00431.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2411.00431)

Discussion