The learned range test method for the inverse inclusion problem

Shiwei Sun, Giovanni S. Alberti
11/1/2024
math.NAcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We consider the inverse problem consisting of the reconstruction of an inclusion $B$ contained in a bounded domain $Ω\subset\mathbb{R}^d$ from a single pair of Cauchy data $(u|_{\partialΩ},\partial_νu|_{\partialΩ})$, where $Δu=0$ in $Ω\setminus\overline B$ and $u=0$ on $\partial B$. We show that the reconstruction algorithm based on the range test, a domain sampling method, can be written as a neural network with a specific architecture. We propose to learn the weights of this network in the framework of supervised learning, and to combine it with a pre-trained classifier, with the purpose of distinguishing the inclusions based on their distance from the boundary. The numerical simulations show that this learned range test method provides accurate and stable reconstructions of polygonal inclusions. Furthermore, the results are superior to those obtained with the standard range test method (without learning) and with an end-to-end fully connected deep neural network, a purely data-driven method.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{sun2024learned,
  title  = {The learned range test method for the inverse inclusion problem},
  author = {Shiwei Sun and Giovanni S. Alberti},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2411.00463},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.00463v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2411.00463.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2411.00463)

Discussion